Part 1
Your Performance Ratings Measure the Manager, Not the Person
A rating says more about who's giving it than who's receiving it. The research is uncomfortable.
Video Series · 28 parts
A 28-part series on building a performance and culture system that holds up: why ratings reflect the rater more than the person, how calibration fixes it, why pay and growth belong in separate conversations, how to hire for culture add instead of “fit,” and how to build a competency framework your managers actually remember. Hosted by Deepti Gupta, co-founder of Sageo.
Watch the full playlist on YouTubePart 1
A rating says more about who's giving it than who's receiving it. The research is uncomfortable.
Part 2
Two honest ratings, both wrong. Meet the strict manager and the distant manager.
Part 3
Leniency, halo, similarity, recency, central tendency. Five biases in almost every review.
Part 4
A structured second look that checks ratings against evidence before they become decisions.
Part 5
The business case against the toxic high performer, in two studies.
Part 6
Demanding leaders raise the standard. Brilliant jerks raise the cost of being near them.
Part 7
Five hiring checks and five on-team warning signals.
Part 8
Score outcomes and behaviour separately, and the toxic-producer box stops hiding.
Part 9
Published values don't predict lived values. The review is where values live or die.
Part 10
A value on a wall can't protect anyone. Only the systems behind it can.
Part 11
Turn a vague value into behaviours a manager can see and rate, at each level.
Part 12
The critical incident technique: write behaviours from real moments, then test them.
Part 13
When “fit” isn't defined, interviewers define it as “like me.” The research is clear.
Part 14
One company saw a problem. Another saw a leader. Same person, same habits.
Part 15
Stop asking “are they like us?” Start asking “what do they add?”
Part 16
Four practical interview changes, and one line for your scorecard.
Part 17
20 minutes of feedback, one number. Guess which part they remember.
Part 18
The people who own the review process don't believe in it either.
Part 19
Same link, different order: a four-step sequence for fair pay and real growth.
Part 20
Two simple frameworks: SBI looks back, GROW looks forward. Neither has a number.
Part 21
More raters doesn't mean more accuracy. It means more rulers.
Part 22
Continuous peer ratings wired straight into pay. What the research found.
Part 23
No score without evidence. Five steps that catch errors in both directions.
Part 24
Same meeting, different starting point: evidence, or a quota.
Part 25
Ask any manager to name the competencies they rate on, from memory.
Part 26
Eight people, 25 competencies, 200 judgments. The maths of unfairness.
Part 27
Use a library as a menu, not a meal. The real test is whether people use it.
Part 28
Three layers, fewer than ten per person, and three rules that keep it honest.

The written series
The same ideas in depth, as a set of long-form articles on the blog.
Read the articles